The UFC finds itself in a tricky situation with Arman Tsarukyan, a rising star in the lightweight division. Despite not holding the 155-pound title, Arman has become the talk of the town, but for reasons beyond his fighting prowess.
Arman's journey to the top has been eventful, to say the least. After the UFC 311 fiasco and an infamous headbutt incident at UFC Qatar, the promotion is left scratching its head. But here's where it gets controversial: Arman's bad boy persona has seemingly boosted his popularity. Former UFC heavyweight Brendan Schaub believes Arman's skill is undeniable, stating, 'He mops the floor with everybody.' But how do you discipline a fighter whose antics outside the ring are as captivating as his performance inside it?
Arman's temper and extracurricular activities have made headlines, especially on the Real American Freestyle (RAF) mats. His involvement in a wild brawl at RAF 06 is just one example of his volatile nature. Yet, this behavior has seemingly added to his allure, leaving the UFC with a dilemma. Do they capitalize on his growing fame, or do they attempt to curb his behavior?
And this is the part most people miss: Arman's success in the ring is undeniable. He's a force to be reckoned with, and his potential to dominate the lightweight division is clear. But with his bad boy image, the UFC must tread carefully. Should they embrace Arman's persona, or is it time for a disciplinary action that might risk his popularity?
The UFC's next move is crucial. Will they give Arman the winner of Holloway vs. Oliveira 2 at UFC 326, or will they take a different path? The promotion must decide how to handle a fighter whose value and exposure have skyrocketed, thanks in part to his controversial behavior. What's your take? Is Arman's bad boy image a blessing or a curse for the UFC?
