Professional cycling is a breathtaking sport, but it’s also one that’s been grappling with a critical issue: rider safety. With crashes making headlines and careers hanging in the balance, the question on everyone’s mind is—how can we make this sport safer? From governing bodies to riders themselves, the debate is fierce, and the solutions are as varied as the courses they race on. But here’s where it gets controversial: is it the speed, the courses, or the riders themselves that need the most attention?
In recent years, the conversation around pro cyclist safety has intensified, with countless voices weighing in. Christian Prudhomme, the director of the Tour de France, boldly stated in late 2024 that riders are simply ‘going too fast.’ Meanwhile, the UCI, cycling’s governing body, has been busy implementing regulatory changes aimed at improving course design and curbing technical innovations. For instance, they’ve banned time trial helmets and ultra-narrow handlebars in road races—moves that have sparked both applause and debate. But this is the part most people miss: while the UCI and race organizers are often in the spotlight, the riders and their sports directors—often former pros themselves—have unique insights that are less frequently heard.
With BikeRadar’s Ashley Quinlan on the ground at the 2026 Santos Tour Down Under, we posed a simple yet profound question to these insiders: What’s the one thing they’d change to improve rider safety? Their answers reveal a complex web of factors, from course design to rider behavior, and even the equipment they use. Let’s dive into their perspectives.
George Bennett (NSN Cycling Team): ‘It’s All About the Roads We Race On’
George Bennett cuts straight to the chase: ‘It all comes down to the roads we race on.’ He emphasizes the importance of course reconnaissance, pointing out that while riders can be blamed for crashes, the real issue often lies in poorly designed courses. ‘Narrowings, especially on high-speed roads, are a major culprit,’ he explains. When the peloton transitions from two lanes to one, the fight for position can lead to disastrous consequences. Bennett argues that focusing on gear ratios or handlebar widths is a distraction from the root cause of many crashes.
Jack Haig (Ineos Grenadiers): ‘More Attention to Courses Before the Race’
Jack Haig highlights the need for better course preparation. ‘Issues often arise just before the start of a stage,’ he notes. He suggests that more time and effort should be dedicated to reviewing courses in advance, ensuring they comply with UCI regulations. ‘If someone reviews the course months ahead, they might spot a dangerous corner or narrowing and request changes,’ he says. This proactive approach could prevent many avoidable accidents.
Jake Stewart (NSN Cycling Team): ‘Barriers in Sprint Finishes Are Key’
Jake Stewart focuses on sprint finishes, where the risk of crashes is highest. He praises the UCI’s new rules requiring barriers without feet, which have significantly improved safety. However, he acknowledges that when riders are pushing their limits, some take greater risks than others. ‘Accidents are part of the sport,’ he admits, ‘but we can’t ignore the need for better course planning, especially at finish lines.’
James Knox (Team Picnic PostNL): ‘Riders Need to Look at Themselves’
James Knox takes a more introspective approach, suggesting that riders themselves must take responsibility. ‘It’s hard to implement, but standardized equipment to reduce speed could be a solution,’ he says. However, he acknowledges the challenge of reaching a consensus among riders and organizers. ‘There are so many moving parts,’ he adds, ‘but the discussion is essential.’
Jussi Veikkanen (Groupama-FDJ United): ‘Respect Between Riders is Crucial’
Jussi Veikkanen, a directeur sportif, emphasizes the importance of mutual respect among riders. ‘As speeds increase, riders must take care of themselves and others,’ he says. While he acknowledges the role of course design and equipment, he believes that fostering a culture of respect could significantly reduce risks.
Matthew Brennan (Team Visma | Lease a Bike): ‘Increase Drag to Slow Us Down’
Matthew Brennan takes a technical approach, suggesting that increasing drag is the key to reducing speed. He cites Dan Bigham’s work and agrees that wider handlebars and aero helmets are steps in the right direction. ‘There’s still more we can do,’ he says, ‘but increasing drag is the way forward.’
Matt White (Movistar Team): ‘Better Course Design is Non-Negotiable’
Matt White stresses the importance of thorough course design checks. ‘Sometimes you wonder how certain courses get approved,’ he says. He highlights the challenges posed by increasing road furniture, especially in Northern Europe, but insists that rider safety must come first. ‘It’s about people’s lives,’ he reminds us.
The Bigger Picture: A Call for Collaboration
The insights from these professionals paint a multifaceted picture of the challenges facing pro cycling safety. From course design to rider behavior, and even equipment modifications, there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. But here’s the controversial question: Are we doing enough to balance the thrill of the sport with the safety of its athletes? And more importantly, who should take the lead in driving these changes—the UCI, race organizers, or the riders themselves?
As the debate continues, one thing is clear: the quest for safer pro cycling requires collaboration, innovation, and a willingness to challenge the status quo. What’s your take? Do you think slower bikes and safer courses are the answer, or is there another aspect we’re missing? Let’s keep the conversation going in the comments below.
